Bored as ever, Mukloi took a tour of the online forums this month, where, surprisingly, a tiny speck of meaning glinted from the cesspool. Cambodia, it seems, is like a Rorschach blot, simultaneously a haven for cheap sin and a cultural gem striving to re-invent itself. A brief spat was ignited by the claim, originally published in the Phnom Penh Post, that Western women have a hard time finding worthy partners here. As a paid up chauvinist and always anxious to join an altercation, Mukloi waded into one of the more urbane forums to heap criticism on the female reporter’s work. Though this miniature battle of the sexes was a good five-minute diversion, the shame of anonymously assassinating someone for merely expressing their opinion is hard to shake. Why do people enjoy slinging sneering insults online? Like Mukloi, many are probably under-worked consultants eking out their miniscule work quota over a long day. But some—usually the failed policeman, goose-stepping, Trotsky-worshipping moderators—have a much more major malfunction.
These guys, at least on the forums that egregiously see themselves as ‘edgy’ and ‘counterculture’, are the dictionary definition of failure; divorced from their podgy wives, parted from their terraced brick coffins, and slowly succumbing to their mercenary sweethearts and the evils of drink. Their almost-touchingly illiterate harangues, which masquerade as ‘front page articles’, are nothing short of tragic.
These self-important rants mark a new low in vanity publishing, their a-grammatical invective plumbing the depths of both embarrassing insecurity and sheer god-awful writing. Usually beginning with a convoluted miasma of obscure adjectives, over-intricate pseudo-leads sinuously slip out of the uninterested reader’s grasp like a slimy eel, words misapplied with infantile naiveté to appallingly simple concepts. Coherent through-lines are as common as hen’s teeth.
Like the red-faced, panting porkers they are, ‘writers’ like “keeping_it_riel” – an English teacher at Street 51’s New World school – tend to run out of steam after the first few paragraphs, resorting to blunt metaphors unskillfully lifted from Jeremy Clarkson’s swaggering columns. Yet, while Clarkson’s inimitable excoriation of modern life can at least raise a smirk, the plodding prose of these most amateur of also-rans can only inspire a depressing mix of boredom and pity. Their choice of subject, either ‘girly bars’ or infuriatingly simplistic restaurant ‘reviews’, is symptomatic of a constrained and frustrated life; these are the highlights of existence, paraded on a pedestal for friendless, fawning acolytes to praise.
Commas are dropped left and right, and full- and semi-colons a mysterious sorcery. Why, one might ask, would someone spend hours laboriously typing with a single finger—regularly halting to hit ‘shift F7’ to make their regrettable account all the less readable—such odious garbage?
The simple answer seems to be insecurity. With few friends and the social skills of a retarded orangutan, these social lepers lack an audience willing to stomach their puerile truisms. Indeed, despite being subject to the utter contempt of those in the media industry, the worst offenders seem to be laboring under the erroneous belief they have talent enough to become a professional, repeated knock-backs and ridicule only fuelling their laughable claims that such risible dreck is ‘too real’ for publication. That is when they’re not getting fired for gross incompetency…
Still, these deluded ignoramuses should receive our sympathy rather than our ire, clinging as they do to their fantasies of unrealized success. Perhaps the Guardian’s Charlie Brooker, writing back 2006, most eloquently summarized the bizarre mentality that pervades these online sewers. “[Forums] appeals to the “lab rat” part of your brain,” he wrote, “the annoying, irrepressible part that adores repetitive pointlessness and would gleefully make you pop bubblewrap till Doomsday if it ever got its way. An unfortunate few, hooked on the futile thrill of online debate, devote their lives to its cause. They roam the internet, actively seeking out viewpoints they disagree with, or squat on messageboards, whining, needling, sneering, over-analysing each new proclamation—joylessly fiddling, like unhappy gorillas doomed to pick lice from one another’s fur for all eternity.”
So, if you’re reading this forum jockeys, the above is how to pen a generalized character assassination without once referring to the facts. Now you know.
MukLoi can be contacted at loyface@gmail.com
UPDATE: Looks like someone rattled the cage over at the online sewer. Cheers for the hits guys! One mistaken name has already been put forward as MukLoi’s alter-ego—WRONG!—but please feel free to try again…